Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Samuel Thiry's avatar

When we talk about fashion and branding, I believe we are overlooking the fundamentals. Global warming is accelerating, and scientists didn’t expect it to happen this quickly. For founders (and believers, VCs, etc.), the core focus should be on impact, purpose, and preserving (all kind of) life on Earth. Branding is a tool; it should not be treated as a fundamental, as it often is.

In conclusion, I agree: climate tech might be seen as old-fashioned (...by fashionistas), but not the fundamentals. The daily news distracts us. Climate change should no longer be the elephant in the room!

Expand full comment
TBLI Radical Truth's avatar

Climatetech is not dead unless you actually question its claims of addressing climate. Climatetech has always been unicorn chasers and had little to no impact on climate. There will be IPOs and unicorns but they won't really address climate change in short term. You can see that by the lack of data of carbon drawdown of the portfolio companies or funds. Dry Air Capture is a Trump like fantasy that will rarely impact climate. DAC is taking a shot glass to the atlantic ocean and say you are going to move it.

Climatetech is not dead it is not a solution to climate change. Once biodiversity has a true value, money will flow there.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts